Legal Opinion

Young v. Hughes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion : Reuben P. Boise, Judge. Action by S. E. Young and others against John Hughes, as administrator of the estate of Seth R. Hammer, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court · MooreJustice Moore

This is a suit by certain stockholders of a corporation, for themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, to establish .and enforce a lien upon a fund in the hands of the representative of a deceased trustee. It is alleged in the complaint, in effect, that the Gold Mountain & Dry Gulch Gold & Silver Mining Company, a corporation, sold its mining property, for which its secretary, Seth R. Hammer, received the sum of $5,000, to be distributed to its stockholders in certain proportions ; that on December 2, 1898, Hammer died intestate, having in his possession of said money the sum…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Mooee.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Dunham v. SiglinOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Cross v. ChichesterOregon Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jansen v. TylerOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ferguson v. ByersOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Henderson v. Tillamook Hotel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Jansen v. TylerOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Stacy v. McNicholasOregon Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API