Legal Opinion
BAKER & McKENZIE ADVOKATBYRA v. THINKSTREAM INC.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 2009No. 2008 CA 2535PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
12This is an appeal by a judgment debtor from a district court judgment making ex-ecutory a judgment first rendered in Sweden and then purportedly made a judgment of the State of Oregon, along with an additional judgment rendered in Oregon. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the district court judgment and remand with instructions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs, Baker & McKenzie Advokat-byra (“BMA”), obtained a default judgment in Stockholm, Sweden, against the defendant, Thinkstream Incorporated (“Thinkstream”), which was rendered on October 31, 2005, and subsequently…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Louisiana Municipal Association v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Medine v. RonigerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Sidney L. Jaffe Ruth Jaffe v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Incorporated, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Standard Chartered Bank v. Ahmad Hamad Al Gosaibi & Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cleartrac, LLC v. Lanrick Contractors, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024