Legal Opinion
Adler v. Board of Education
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 1, 1961PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGtvern, J.
Plaintiffs, Adler and Feinstein, move for summary judgment, and defendants, the Board of Education of the City of New York and the City of New York, cross-move for similar relief.
Plaintiffs, who are employees of the Board of Education of the City of New York, were heretofore suspended from their positions, without pay, on the basis of charges preferred against *790them by the Superintendent of Schools. The Board of Education thereafter withdrew the charges and restored to them the full amount of the salaries which they would have earned had they continued to be employed during the period of their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Transit Commission v. Long Island RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- New York City Tunnel Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Matter of City of N.Y. (Bronx River Parkway)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- People Ex Rel. Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Acme Builders, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- La Forge v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.