Legal Opinion

State v. Nickerson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1989No. 54754PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by the court for driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and fined $350. He appeals; we affirm.

In his principal point on appeal defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that he “operated” his motor vehicle while intoxicated. In determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s finding of guilt, we view all the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the state and disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Hoeber, 737 S.W.2d 484, 485…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. TroutnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. O'TooleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. HoeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Taylor v. McNeillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cox v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Chinnery v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. DeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Wilson v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. State v. ElamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API