Legal Opinion
Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew Cate
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2013No. 10-55985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZIPPS, District Judge:
Appellant DeArcey Jamul Stewart (“Stewart”) appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habe-as petition as untimely. Stewart is serving a sentence in state prison of two life terms plus seven years following convictions for attempted murder. After pursuing post-conviction relief in state court, Stewart filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. After thorough review, the district court denied Stewart’s federal habeas petition as untimely.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Canez v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Christina DiIorio-Sterling v. P Capstone Management, LLC, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- DiIorio-Sterling v. Capstone Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022