Legal Opinion

Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew Cate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 1, 2014No. 10-55985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEARCEY JAMUL STEWART, No. 10-55985 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:05-cv-01059- BTM-CAB MATTHEW L. CATE, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 5, 2012—Pasadena, California Filed November 1, 2013 Amended May 1, 2014 Before: Marsha S. Berzon and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge.* Order; Opinion by Judge Zipps; Dissent…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (HC)Tran v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Cedric Taylor v. Sean MooreDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API