Legal Opinion

Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided December 14, 1960No. Claim No. 34766PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard Ryan, P. J.

The above-entitled claimant is a partnership consisting of several individual engineers, each licensed to engage in his profession in this State. As such entity they sue for the agreed and reasonable value of services rendered pursuant to a contract with the State of New York acting by and through the Superintendent of Public Works, less certain payments received on account. As originally pleaded the claim contained five causes of action. The first cause of action was for a balance due on account in the amount of $153,389.31. This demand has been reduced to $82,517.12 as the result of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rusciano & Son Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1952
  2. Rusciano & Son Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. D'Angelo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Edwards v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton v. New York State Thruway AuthorityNew York Court of Claims · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API