Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fowler v. Eggers

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1910No. 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceeding. Mandamus by the State on the relation of Leonard B. Fowler against J. Eggers, State Controller, and another. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, J.:

This is an application for a writ of mandate requiring the state controller to draw his warrant in favor of rela*536tor for salary as deputy attorney-general for the months of January and February, and for that part of March extending from the 1st to the 22d, 1909.

During all the times mentioned, and previously thereto, he was acting as stenographer in the attorney-general’s office, and received from the state for his services in that connection $100 per month. An act approved February 8, 1908, authorized the attorney-general to appoint deputies, but did not provide for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. SteeleTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. State v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State Ex Rel. Wilkins v. HallockNevada Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State Ex Rel. Cutting v. LaGraveNevada Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Abel v. EggersNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nickel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Oster v. JorgensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Oster v. JorgensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API