Legal Opinion

American Stone Ballast Co. v. Marshall's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 12, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Appellant’s rock crnshing plant is located consider- , ably below the tracks of the -Cincinnati, New Orleans and *134Texas-Pacific Railway Company, and connected therewith by a spur track, which is quite steep. Near the crusher bins the spur track splits into three switch tracks, one called the “run-around track,” -which as its name implies does not enter but runs around the crusher, and two others which pass under the crusher bins and are called, respectively, the “screening's” and the “ballast” track.

On the morning of the accident which resulted in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Watson v. Ky. & Ind. Bridge & Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. City of Louisville v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Cohen & Stryck v. Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siler v. Morgan Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1936
  2. Criswell v. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. United States Casualty Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Leachman v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. J. P. Burton Coal Company v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API