Legal Opinion

Refsnes v. Myers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1931No. 23240. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent sued appellants individually, alleging that they were copartners engaged in the business of selling blue foxes, with their principal place of business in Seattle, to recover eight hundred dollars and interest upon a contract for the sale and delivery to him of four pairs of blue foxes. The complaint set up a contract in writing, dated April 17,. 1925, which recites:

“Fox Farmers is a corporation engaged in the business of raising and handling foxes and has sold to Gustav Refsnes four (4) pairs of Grade A Blue Foxes, two pairs 1924 pups and two pairs 1925 pups for the purchase price…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. OkerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. American Radiator Co. v. KinnearWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kwapil v. Bell Tower Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Midwest Air Filters Pacific, Inc. v. Finn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Miller v. DenmanWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodruck v. Sand Point Maintenance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wilkerson v. WegnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  3. Sheffield Co. v. R. Hoe & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Terrell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API