Legal Opinion

Clements v. Thornton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for damages for breach of an oral contract to procure and maintain insurance in force. Plaintiff claims defendants, who are independent insurance agents, agreed to keep him covered by temporary coverage through binders until permanent coverage could be obtained but failed to do so. During the time he claims he was to have been covered he had an accident in which he demolished his vehicle and suffered other losses for which he seeks reimbursement. Defendants appealed from a judgment for plaintiff entered pursuant to a jury verdict.

Because plaintiff received a verdict, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Derby v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  2. Ginter v. HandyOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Son v. Ashland Community Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Joseph Forest Products, Inc. v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OREGON v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Monsantofils v. Gacek Insurance Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API