Legal Opinion

Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. Keegan

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 5, 1942No. 67PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

This action is on a judgment rendered February 1, 1940, by the Supreme Court of New York against the defendant Keegan, a Maine citizen. It is based on a decree finding Keegan guilty of contempt of court and assessing damages, under Section 924 of the New York Civil Practice Act, for interposing a false claim to property in the possession of a sheriff who held it under a warrant of attachment in a suit in favor of the plaintiff, against Francis W. Kurtz & Co., Inc., a New York corporation, of which Keegan’s son was an officer. A fine of $7,500 was imposed for presenting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kenneth Adams v. Terrel H. Bell, Individually, and as Secretary of the Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Hadden v. Rumsey Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Bowles v. Barde Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jones v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API