Sartorious v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
In error from the circuit court of Hinds county; Hon. Richard Barnett, judge. At. the October term, 1849, of Warren county, the plaintiff in error was indicted for buying certain' stolen articles, being copper'pipe worth $15, a stop-cock worth $10, three brass boxes worth $15, and pieces of casting worth $10, knowing them to be stolen.
Read the full summary
In error from the circuit court of Hinds county; Hon. Richard Barnett, judge. At. the October term, 1849, of Warren county, the plaintiff in error was indicted for buying certain' stolen articles, being copper'pipe worth $15, a stop-cock worth $10, three brass boxes worth $15, and pieces of casting worth $10, knowing them to be stolen. He was tried-at the April term, 1850, and the jury returned a verdict of “ guilty,” which verdict was set aside, a new trial granted, and the venue changed to Hinds county. At the May term, 1850, of-the Hinds county circuit court, he was again tried; and, the…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Smith
The plaintiff in error was tried and convicted in the circuit court of Hinds county upon a charge of having purchased stolen goods, the property of Redding & Peck, with a kriowl-edge-that said goods were stolen. A motion was made for a new trial, which was overruled. The bill of exceptions filed to the decision of the court overruling said motion, contains the evidence adduced on the trial, and sets out the exceptions taken by the prisoner during the progress of the trial, and the instructions, which were granted or refused at the instance of the State or the prisoner.
The exceptions brought…
2Cited by29 opinions
- Hentz v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Pettus v. S TateMississippi Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Perry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.