Legal Opinion

Wade v. Stimson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 10, 1946No. Civ. 26873Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY, Associate Justice.

This is an action to prevent defendants from enforcing a claim arising under the Renegotiation Statutes and the amendments thereto, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 1191, the contention of the plaintiffs being that the statute is unconstitutional.

The plaintiffs are partners doing business at two locations in Detroit, Michigan. Their business is the precision manufacture of tools, dies, etc., in accordance with the *278specifications of their customers, to he used in fabricating war materials to be sold to the United States. During 1944 plaintiffs entered into numerous contracts for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. ForrestalSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API