Legal Opinion

Shuffman v. Hartford Textile Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 1981No. 1341, Docket No. 81-5007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is the latest in a series of meritless, frivolous appeals, motions and related proceedings1 brought by Attorney David K. Shuffman (hereinafter “Shuffman”) purportedly on behalf of his mother, Rose Shuffman, as executrix of the estate of Oscar Shuffman (hereinafter “appellant”), against Hartford Textile Corporation, Oxford Chemicals, Inc., and Wellington Print Works, Inc., three companies formerly in Chapter XI which now are part of The Hartford Corporation, a successor company which itself is the debtor in a pending Chapter XI proceeding.

The specific appeal presently before us is from an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Graciela Acevedo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Browning Debenture Holders' Committee v. Dasa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. In the Matter of Samuel A. BithoneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  5. Bankers Trust Company v. Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. J. M. Cleminshaw Co. v. City of NorwichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  2. Kaynard v. MMIC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. In Re Hartford Textile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Kaynard v. Mmic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API