Legal Opinion
Austin v. Kemper Corporation (Insurance)
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 13, 2021No. 3:21-cv-03208Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-03208-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 KEMPER CORPORATION (INSURANCE), Re: Dkt. No. 54 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is defendant Kemper Corporation’s motion to dismiss the First Amended 14 Complaint (“FAC”) per Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), and defendant’s motion to strike certain portions 15 of the FAC per Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(f). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this 16 matter appropriate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.