Legal Opinion

Aecon Buildings, Inc. v. Vandermolen Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 28, 2009No. 62374-5-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Aecon, a general contractor, took a default judgment against subcontractor Casebeer and his company, Chinook, when they failed to appear in a construction defect lawsuit. Chinook’s insurer, Hartford, moved to vacate the default order on the equitable ground that Aecon failed to notify Hartford when it filed suit and served Casebeer. Hartford appeared and contested the *736motion for default judgment. The trial court denied Hartford’s motion to vacate the default and entered judgment after taking evidence. We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Aecon Buildings Inc. served as general contractor for the construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Smith v. Behr Process Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Little v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aecon Bldgs. Inc. v. Vandermolen Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. Aecon Buildings, Inc. v. Vandermolen Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API