Legal Opinion

Sitton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 18, 2003No. 49923-8-IPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

This is a class action by State Farm insureds, who allege State Farm acted in bad faith to deny coverage for medical expenses. We granted discretionary review to determine whether the trial court erred in refusing to decertify the class, particularly in light of its adopted trial plan. We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in granting class certification under CR 23(b)(3), but that *249certification under CR 23(b)(1) and (b)(2) was improper. We also vacate the trial plan because it contemplates an award of damages without proof of causation and without an opportunity for State Farm…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Moeller v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kavu, Inc. v. Omnipak Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007
  4. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API