Legal Opinion
Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1995No. 93-CV-346, 93-CV-383PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment Per Curiam.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part by Associate Judge FERREN at p. 1211.
Separate opinion by Associate Judge STEADMAN at p. 1224.
Separate opinion by Associate Judge FARRELL at p. 1225.
2Per curiam
Pursuant to Parts I., II., and III.B. of the opinion of Judge FERREN, joined in this regard by Judge STEADMAN, the order appealed from is reversed insofar as it orders payment by plaintiff to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Pursuant to the opinion of Judge STEADMAN, joined in this regard by Judge FARRELL, the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent…
3Cited by9 opinions
- Peart v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Francis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Anderson v. AbidoyeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Anderson v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anderson v. DIST. OF COL. HOUS. AUTH.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.