Francis v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
In this appeal, we are required to address a trial court’s power to modify a sentence in the course of a sentencing procedure that extended over a five-week period. The upward modification came about when the trial court discovered that appellant would likely receive presentence credit for time spent in a halfway house, thus frustrating the court’s intent, expressed at the initial sentencing hearing, to have appellant actually serve two years’ imprisonment. We hold that, under the facts of the present case, the trial court did not exceed its authority in sentencing…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Siddiq v. OstheimerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- MICHAEL T. MARSHALL v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Shelton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- ETDH Associates v. Waterfall Ventures, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gardner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.