Legal Opinion

O'Malley v. Naphcare Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 21, 2015No. Case No. 3:12-cv-326PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 64); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 63)

Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge

This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff Teresa Lynn O’Malley’s (“O’Malley”) and *463Defendant NaphCare, Inc.’s (“NaphCare”) cross motions to compel discovery. Does. 63, 64, 65. Both motions have been fully briefed, see docs. 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, and are now ripe for decision.

I. BACKGROUND

O’Malley initiated this case in October 2012, alleging a number of claims stemming from the termination of her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. A.W. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. ACT, Inc. v. Worldwide Interactive NetworkDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
  3. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC v. BoydDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API