O'Malley v. Naphcare Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 64); AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. 63)
Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge
This civil case is before the Court on Plaintiff Teresa Lynn O’Malley’s (“O’Malley”) and *463Defendant NaphCare, Inc.’s (“NaphCare”) cross motions to compel discovery. Does. 63, 64, 65. Both motions have been fully briefed, see docs. 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, and are now ripe for decision.
I. BACKGROUND
O’Malley initiated this case in October 2012, alleging a number of claims stemming from the termination of her…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
3Cited by73 opinions
- A.W. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- ACT, Inc. v. Worldwide Interactive NetworkDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2019
- AT&T Mobility Services, LLC v. BoydDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- American Municipal Power, Inc. v. Voith Hydro, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.