Legal Opinion

AT&T Mobility Services, LLC v. Boyd

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 21, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02539Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, Case No. 1:19cv2539 Plaintiff, -vs- JUDGE PAMELA A. BARKER Robert Boyd, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendant ORDER Currently pending are Defendant Robert Boyd’s (1) Motion for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery; and (2) Motion for Leave to File Supplement to Motion to Conduct Limited Discovery Instanter and Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jeremy Dunlap. (Doc. Nos. 18, 20.) Plaintiff AT&T Mobility Services, LLC opposes both motions. (Doc. Nos. 19, 22.) For the following reasons, Defendant’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. William C. Lewis v. Acb Business Services, Inc., (96-3093/3498), American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. James P. Connors, (96-3498)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Three Valleys Municipal Water District v. E.F. Hutton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API