Michigan Department of State v. United States
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.
Before this Court is Plaintiff Michigan Department of State’s (“Michigan”) claims that 42 U.S.C. § 666(a)(13) is unconstitutional and that even if the statute is constitutional, the Department of Health and Human Services’ (“DHHS”) decision to deny Michigan an exemption from this statute under 42 U.S.C § 666(d) violates the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 (2001). Currently pending are Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and Defendants United States of America, Department of Health and Human Services, and Tommy G. Thompson’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Greidinger v. AlmandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- MONTANA SHOOTING SPORTS ASS'N v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Gardner v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2005
- Opinion No. (2004), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.