Legal Opinion

Gardner v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 3, 2007No. 1:05CV00088-WRWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILSON, District Judge.

Pending is separate Defendants U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Wally Walters, and Thomas S. Park’s (“Corps”) Motion to Dismiss. 1 Plaintiffs (“Gard-ners”) responded, 2 the Corps filed a Reply, 3 and the Gardners filed a Surreply. The Corps asserts that this action is brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), and that Plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative rem edies. Alternatively, the Corps argues that there is no final agency action.

I. Background

The Gardners filed a complaint for in-junctive and declaratory relief asking that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API