Legal Opinion

Cruikshank v. Horn

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided January 29, 1986No. 85-514PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONIELSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant-auctioneers appeal from judgment for plaintiff-seller in an action for an accounting of auction proceeds, asserting: (1) that auctioneers should not bear the loss resulting from failure of the bank in which the proceeds were deposited and that the risk of the bank’s failure was unforeseeable; (2) that the evidence was sufficient to establish a custom to which they conformed; and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to establish the existence of a confidential relationship between the parties.

Plaintiff, Hazel Cruikshank, hired defendants (Horn) to conduct…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merritt v. EasterlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Sylvester v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. C-E-I-R, Inc. v. Computer Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. In re Estate of WorkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
  3. Cruikshank v. HornCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API