Cruikshank v. Horn
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
DONIELSON, Presiding Judge.
Defendant-auctioneers appeal from judgment for plaintiff-seller in an action for an accounting of auction proceeds, asserting: (1) that auctioneers should not bear the loss resulting from failure of the bank in which the proceeds were deposited and that the risk of the bank’s failure was unforeseeable; (2) that the evidence was sufficient to establish a custom to which they conformed; and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to establish the existence of a confidential relationship between the parties.
Plaintiff, Hazel Cruikshank, hired defendants (Horn) to conduct…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merritt v. EasterlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Sylvester v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- C-E-I-R, Inc. v. Computer Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- In re Estate of WorkmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Cruikshank v. HornCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986