Legal Opinion
C-Y Development Co. v. City of Redlands
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1983No. 81-5779PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
C-Y Development Company and Harvest Investment Company (C-Y) appeal from a district court order abstaining from the exercise of jurisdiction over C-Y’s action against the City of Redlands, various public officials, and certain public employees. We affirm.
I
In November 1978, the voters of the City of Redlands, acting by initiative, adopted Proposition R. It limited the number of residential building permits for subdivision development projects to 450 per year and required the city council to adopt a procedure to allocate the limited number of available permits on a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- American International Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc., a Philippines Corporation v. The Continental Insurance Company, a New Hampshire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- World Famous Drinking Emporium, Inc. v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.