Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1959No. 7 Div. 411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

The appellee, Delia G. Stephens, brought suit against the appellants, Neal Hammond, Warren C. Meeks, and Roy C. Rochester, for damages accruing to the appellee as a result of trespass by the appellants on a tract of land, owned by and in the possession of appellee, and for cutting the timber thereon.

The case was tried on count one and count two, both of which are in trespass, each count asking damages in the amount of one thousand dollars.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of one thousand dollars. This appeal is from that judgment.

*212I. Both counts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Howell v. City of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Lee v. GidleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  4. Davis v. Miller-Brent Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. Mabel Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Hogan v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Agee v. GriffinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Loper v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Boatright v. MorganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API