Legal Opinion

William C. Atwater & Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 28, 1928No. D-125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This suit grows out of several orders issued by the Navy Department to the plaintiff for the purchase and procurement of coal. The orders were accepted, the coal delivered, and the plaintiff paid in full' the price fixed in the orders. It is here claiming that its coal was requisitioned, and that it is entitled to the full market value of the same at export prices.

The plaintiff, at the time it received and accepted the orders, was engaged in business as a sales agent, purchasing the output of the mines of others and reselling to coal dealers and consumers without physically handling the coal.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. New River Collieries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Hooe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. New York & Baltimore Transportation Line v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API