Legal Opinion

Kurten v. HANGER PROSTHETIC AND, ORTHOTICS, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2005No. Civ.A. 3:04-20JPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GIBSON, District Judge.

This case comes before the Court on Hanger Prosthetics and Orthotics, Inc., formerly known as Teufel Associates (hereinafter “Defendant”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 14) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. In consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Randall T. Kurten’s (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 20), and the record in the case sub judice, the Court shall deny the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment for the following reasons.

JURISDICTION

Juri…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Norfolk Southern Railway Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Witbeck v. Equipment Transport, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API