Legal Opinion
Cain v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 4, 2003No. 03-5020PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Once again, shareholders of a failed savings and loan association (also called a “thrift”) seek damages in this Winstar-related case for the government’s breach of its alleged contract with them to permit the thrift to use an accounting method favorable to it. The United States Court of Federal Claims dismissed the shareholders’ complaint because they had not shown that they had a contract with the government. Cain v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 658 (2002). We affirm.
I
A. The background and consequences of the savings and loan industry’s financial crisis in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Glass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- La Van v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- American Capital Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Mola Development Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.