Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Mathews
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BRYANT, District Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on defendant’s Motion To Dismiss and both parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies defendant’s Motion To Dismiss and defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment, and grants plaintiff’s Motion For Summary Judgment.
Plaintiff Humana, a “provider of services” [42 U.S.C. § 1395x(u)] under Title XVIII of the Medicare Act, has brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the provisions of 20 C.F.R. § 405.429(a), the defendant’s regulation establishing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richard Pickus v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Miriam Rodway v. The United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Elliott v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Humana, Inc. v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- The American Association Of Councils Of Medical Staffs Of Private Hospitals, Inc. v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Fralin v. KozlowskiCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.