State v. Torpy

The issues as we see them are:

1. Did the trial court err in finding the defendant had committed a sex crime upon hearsay testimony?

2. Was the recommendation of the H&SS Department for specialized treatment void because:(a) The H&SS Department did not certify it had adequate facilities for examining the defendant?(b) The examination given to the defendant did not include a physical examination.

3. Are the criteria upon which the H&SS Department bases its recommendations invalid and is the statute constitutionally void for vagueness ?

4. Is the phrase “dangerous to the public” a sufficient…