Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Hart
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1939No. 16995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JANVIER, Judge.
The questions presented in these consolidated rules is whether Act No. 156 of 1912, which is now amended by Act No. 260 of 1918 and by Act No. 421 of 1938, is violative of Section 16, Article 3 of the Constitution of 1921, which provides that “every law enacted by the Legislature shall embrace but one object, and shall have a title indicative of such object”.
The principal suit was brought by Rhoda Jackson in forma pauperis. The defendants were Joseph Hart, in whose premises the plaintiff alleged that she had sustained injuries, and London & Lancashire Indemnity Company of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Hide Co. v. BestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Grinage v. Times-Democrat Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Peoples Homestead & Savings Ass'n v. MaslingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Wm. M. Barret, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Hope v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jackson v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939