Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. McIlhenny

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 10, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Harris County. Tried below before Hon. Chas. E. Ashe.

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit for damages for breach of contract and to foreclose a lien on land given to secure the performance of said contract. The contract sued on and the lien sought to be foreclosed are evidenced by the following instruments:

"This agreement made and entered into this 25th day of March, A.D. 1895, by and between S.K. McIlhenny, party of the first part, and Charles Tinsley, party of the second part. Be it known, the party of the first part hereby agrees to sell, and does sell, to party of second part, twenty thousand ($20,000) dollars, par value of Reeves and Martin County, Texas, 6 per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Collins v. Ball, Hutchings & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Closner v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Slaughter v. Crisian NesbitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. City Nat. Bank of Commerce v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Chapman v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Harris v. LattimoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API