Legal Opinion

Di Paolo v. H.B.M. Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action, inter alla, to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered December 16,1982, as denied their motion, inter alla, for summary judgment on their first cause of action. Order modified, on the law, by granting plaintiffs’ motion as to defendants Ernest R. Csak and Ingeborg *795Csak and defendant B & D Paving Company, Inc. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the plaintiffs payable jointly by said defendants. Plaintiffs’ mortgage was a “building loan…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Spruck v. . McRobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Kleet Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Tri Quality Mechanical Corp. v. Chappastream Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Tri-State Sol-Aire Corp. v. Lakeville Pace Mechanical, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Rigano v. Vibar Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Rigano v. Vibar Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API