Legal Opinion
Rigano v. Vibar Construction, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 11, 2013Published
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to Lien Law § 19 (6), in effect, to *830summarily discharge a mechanic’s lien (proceeding No. 1), and a related proceeding pursuant to Lien Law § 12-a (2) to amend the notice of the subject lien dated March 23, 2010, nunc pro tunc, inter alia, to correct the name of the owner of the subject premises and to reflect that the lienor is named Vibar Construction Corp., instead of Vibar Construction, Inc. (proceeding No. 2), Vibar Construction Corp., named in proceeding No. 1 as Vibar Construction, Inc., appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church E. Gates & Co. v. National Fair & Exposition Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Di Paolo v. H.B.M. Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re Kleet Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Tri Quality Mechanical Corp. v. Chappastream Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Tri-State Sol-Aire Corp. v. Lakeville Pace Mechanical, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995