Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Holliday
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0444PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
In a complaint filed pro se in the Superi- or Court of the District of Columbia, plaintiff Wallace Mitchell accuses three high-level officials of the Bureau of Prisons, including former Director Charles E. Sam-uels, Jr., of (1) attempting to cause his “wrongful death” by knowingly feeding him soy meals to which he was allergic; (2) ordering the destruction of his legal materials; and (3) acting with deliberate indifference to his mental health needs by changing his “diagnosis from paranoid schizophrenia, to antisocial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Chandler v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- RAMBERT v. KRASNERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.