Legal Opinion

Equitable Life Assurance Society of U. S. v. Saurman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1936No. Appeal, 18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

Early in July 1932, Elizabeth W. Saurman wrote a letter to the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States seeking information as to the cost of an annuity. On July 5, 1932 two agents of the company, Ralph C. Carnes and John P. Cranston, called upon, her, at which time Elizabeth Saurman made an application for a 3%-unit contract, which application contained no information as to the monthly payment to be paid. Shortly afterwards a notation was made on the application to issue an additional contract for 1% units. Twd contracts of the company were issued for 3%…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Boyce v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Custis v. SerrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Kaufman v. New York L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stowe Township v. Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. v. Arnold, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County1960
  3. Weidler v. Washington National Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API