Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Goldman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1971No. 33885PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Defendant Cecilia Goldman was found by the City Court of St. Louis to have violated the City’s ordinance against disturbing the peace. Upon appeal to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction in a jury-waived case, she was again found guilty of violating the City’s peace disturbance ordinance and fined $500. She appeals. This appeal comes to us by transfer from the Supreme Court.

On appeal, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and the form and sufficiency of the information.

The information under attack reads as follows: “On…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Kansas City v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Kansas City v. MathisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. LaRoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. Kansas City v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. City of St. Louis v. EskridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Kansas City v. WallerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. City of St. Louis v. EskridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API