Legal Opinion
City of St. Louis v. Eskridge
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 6, 1972No. 34104PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Judge.
This air pollution case is before us on rehearing. The original opinion reversed the judgment of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. The rehearing was held before the court en banc.
On trial to the court without a jury, defendant was found guilty of violating the “Air Pollution Control” ordinance of the City of St. Louis by permitting a truck he was driving to emit from its exhaust a plume of visible air contaminants of a degree of opacity in excess of the prescribed limit of Ordinance No. S4669 of the City of St. Louis. Defendant appealed.
The ordinance in question is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. BockstruckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. ZammarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- People v. International Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- People v. Plywood Mfrs. of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AchterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Air Pollution Variance Board v. Western Alfalfa Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Lloyd A. Fry Co. v. Utah Air Conservation CommitteeUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Kansas City v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of St. Louis v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975