Legal Opinion

Dichman, Wright & Pugh, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 29, 1956PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

This is a suit in admiralty to recover amounts of charter hire which libelant claims to have overpaid. Three “causes of action” are set forth in the libel but the first and third have been held to be time barred. Respondent United States, the shipowner, excepts to the second on the ground of insufficiency.

Libelant seeks to recover amounts paid, under a sliding scale of “additional charter hire” set forth in the charter party, insofar as they exceed 50% of so much of its profits as exceed 10% on the capital employed in the operation of the ships. It cites in support of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massachusetts Trustees of Eastern Gas and Fuel Associates, Libelants-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  3. American Export Lines, Inc. v. United States. New York and Cuba Mail Steamship Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. United States v. East Harbor Trading CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. United States v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Indemnity Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API