Legal Opinion

Bell v. Myrtle

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1959No. 2364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This was a suit to recover damages for personal injuries received by the infant plaintiff and for expenses incurred in her behalf by her mother. From a jury verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal,, contending that the trial court erred in not permitting a police officer to give his opinion as to the approximate speed of defendant’s vehicle at the time of impact, and in-refusing plaintiffs’ instruction relating to the doctrine of last clear chance.

The accident occurred in the District of Columbia when defendant was driving south through a school zone on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Carroll v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Charles W. Padgett v. Buxton-Smith Mercantile Company and Floyd R. EhrmannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. Giant Food Stores, Inc. v. Ida M. FineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spain v. McNealDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Phillips v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Logsdon v. BakerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  4. Rand v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API