Miller v. Martig
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs Naney and Kimball Miller (collectively, the Millers) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the appellee-defendant, Dr. John Martig. Specifically, the Millers contend that the trial court lacked the authority to grant Dr. Martig's petition for a preliminary determination of law, and that the entry of summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact existed with regard to the standard of care. In essence, the Millers assert that a physician-patient relationship existed and the standard of care was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Dixon v. SiwyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roberts v. SankeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kuester v. InmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Thomas Haggerty and Cathy Haggerty v. Anonymous Party 1, Anonymous Party 2, and Anonymous Party 3Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ob-Gyn Associates of Northern Indiana, P.C. v. RansbottomIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.