Legal Opinion

DiMartino v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1963No. Appeal, No. 69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

The question here is whether the defendant insurance company agreed in its policy of insurance to pay the plaintiff’s medical expenses incurred as the result of an injury suffered when a truck struck a wall which fell upon and injured the plaintiff.

The insurance company contracted to pay the plaintiff’s reasonable expenses incurred for necessary medical expenses for bodily injury “caused by accident, while occupying or through being struck by the owned automobile, or any other land motor vehicle or trailer not operated on rails or crawler treads . .

It is stipulated that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Johnston v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gant v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Eynon v. Continental Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Brown v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bates v. United Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. GOVT. EMP. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. DeBerry v. American Motorists InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Elrod v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Klotz v. Selected Risks InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API