Legal Opinion

Hill v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

There was judgment in denial of the motion, and the defendant, the Director-General of Railroads, excepted and appealed. Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of North Carolina, institutes this action against the North Carolina Railroad Company, a domestic corporation, and the Director-General of Railroads, as having charge of same under the Federal statutes and executive proclamations and orders applicable, to recover damages for physical injuries wrongfully suffered by plaintiff of the defendant from the negligent operation of defendant's road in Rowan County, N.C. by its lessee, the Southern…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. American Car & Foundry Co. v. KettlehakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Fritzlen v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Lathrop, Shea & Henwood Co. v. Interior Construction & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. UmbaughNevada Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Leggett v. Southeastern People's College, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. American InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API