Daiva Richardson and Ronnie Richardson v. City of South Euclid Arnold C. D'Amico Jack Clifford James Farrell and John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question whether a criminal misdemeanor prosecution under an ordinance later determined to be constitutionally invalid gives rise to a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 injury where no deprivation other than that suffered as a result of maintaining a legal defense is sustained by the party prosecuted. We conclude that criminal prosecution alone does not result in a constitutional deprivation or support a section 1983 claim, and we affirm the district court’s summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ action.
I
Plaintiffs Ronnie and Daiva Richardson are a married…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fulson v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Reyes v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Smith v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Hillsboro Properties v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.