Legal Opinion

Thomas Burgess v. Rands Trucking, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 11, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00596Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THOMAS BURGESS, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 25-cv-596-jdp RANDS TRUCKING, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff Thomas Burgess, proceeding without counsel, works as a semi-truck driver. Burgess alleges that he applied for a job with defendant Rands Trucking, Inc. and was denied pursuant to a policy against hiring candidates with felony convictions. Burgess brings a claim for race discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, contending that Rands Trucking’s policy has an unlawful disparate impact on African American…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Kendale L. Adams v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States of America by and Through Joseph E. Garst v. Lockheed-Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API