Legal Opinion

Golden's Foundry & Machine Co. v. Wight

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1926No. 16323PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A corporation may transact business within its corporate powers in a name other than its legally authorized corporate name. Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., 158 Ga. 1 (123 S. E. 132) ; Home Machine & Foundry Co. v. Davis Foundry & Machine Works, 135 Ga. 18 (3) (68 S. E. 800); McClain v. Georgian Co., 17 Ga. App. 648 (3) (87 S. E. 1090); 14 C. J. 591.

2. The officers of a corporation who transact its business under an assumed or trade name are not liable to a person dealing with them as a corporation in ignorance of this fact for a debt contracted by them under the assumed name,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saunders System Atlanta Co. v. Drive It Yourself Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Rome Machine & Foundry Co. v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. McClain v. Georgian Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Pilsen Brewing Co. v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  3. Resnick v. Abner B. Cohen Advertising, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. United Rentals Systems, Inc. v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API