Legal Opinion

C. F. Lytle Co. v. Hansen & Rowland, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1945No. 11010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants and defendants, C. F. Lytle Company, Inc., and Green Construction Company, joint venturers, here appeal from a judgment of the district court, jury being waived, that plaintiff and appellee, Hansen & Rowland, Inc., agents of the Phoenix Indemnity Company and assignee of its claim for insurance premiums, were entitled to judgment in the sum of $16,153.73 plus interest and costs. The claim was for short-rate public liability and property damage insurance premiums covering the period from June 17, 1942, to September 1, 1942. Jurisdiction of the district court was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Macale v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Matter of Pettit v. RegesNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Olsen v. VenessWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. B. & B. Building Material Co. v. Winston Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hansen & Rowland, Inc. v. C. F. Lytle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Peoples Supply, Inc. v. Vogel-Ritt of Penn-Mar-Va., Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API