Legal Opinion

Olsen v. Veness

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1919No. 15199PublishedCited by 23 opinions

• Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Reynolds, J., entered December 10, 1918, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action in tort.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

One Clark, a logging contractor, hired of the defendants, Yeness and Shives, an auto truck, pursuant to the following agreement:

“The contract was drawn for either twenty-five or thirty dollars a day. I don’t recall which it is for certain. They were to furnish the driver and truck, and he (Clark) was to furnish oil and gas and any repairs, breakage, to keep the truck in repair and driver’s time—the truck’s time was to be with the driver’s time; if he worked more than eight hours, why the truck was to be more than eight hours; that price was to be an eight-hour price and over that the truck…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Babbitt v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Davis v. Early Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Macale v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wilcox v. BasehoreWashington Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API